Phoenix Beverages 2022 Integrated Report

REPORTING CONTEXT ABOUT US OUR OPERATING CONTEXT OUR PERFORMANCE OUR LEADERSHIP GOVERNANCE OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS SHAREHOLDERS' CORNER (t) Fair value measurement The Group and the Company measures financial instruments, such as financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income and land and buildings at fair value at each reporting date. Also, fair values of financial instruments are disclosed in note 3.2 and its respective notes. Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value measurement is based on the presumption that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability takes place either: • In the principal market for the asset or liability, or • In the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The principal or the most advantageous market must be accessible to the Group. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest. A fair value measurement of a non-financial asset takes into account a market participant’s ability to generate economic benefits by using the asset in its highest and best use or by selling it to another market participant that would use the asset in its highest and best use. The Group and the Company uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data are available to measure fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and minimising the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities for which fair value is measured or disclosed in the financial statements are categorised within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole: • Level 1 – Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. • Level 2 – Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or indirectly observable. • Level 3 – Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement is unobservable. The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For this purpose, the significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a level 3 measurement. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgement, considering factors specific to the asset or liability. The determination of what constitutes ‘observable’ requires significant judgement by the Group and the Company. Management considers observable data to be that market data that is readily available, regularly distributed or updated, reliable and verifiable, not proprietary, and provided by independent sources that are actively involved in the relevant market. For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial statements on a recurring basis, the Group and the Company determines whether transfers have occurred between Levels in the hierarchy by re-assessing categorisation (based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole) at the end of each reporting period. Management determines the policies and procedures for recurring fair value measurement, such as Financial Assets at Fair value through other comprehensive income. External valuers are involved for valuation of significant assets such as land and buildings. Involvement of external valuers is decided and approved by the Board of Directors. Selection criteria include market knowledge, reputation, independence and whether professional standards are maintained. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued) 2.1 APPLICATIONOFNEWANDREVISED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTINGSTANDARDS (IFRS) New and revised standards that are effective but with no material effect on the financial statements In the current year, the Group and the Company have adopted all of the new and revised standards and interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”) and the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”) of the IASB that are relevant to the Group’s and the Company’s operations and effective for accounting periods beginning on 1 July 2021. (i) Relevant new and revised Standards in issue but not yet effective At the date of authorisation of these financial statements, the following relevant new and revised standards were in issue but effective on annual periods beginning on or after the respective dates as indicated: IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements - Amendments regarding the classification of liabilities (effective 1 January 2023) IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements - Amendments regarding the disclosure of accounting policies (effective 1 January 2023) IAS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors - Amendments regarding the definition of accounting estimates (effective 1 January 2023) IAS 12 Income Taxes - Amendments regarding deferred tax on leases and decommissioning obligations (effective 1 January 2023) IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment - Amendments prohibiting a company from deducting from the cost of property, plant and equipment amounts received from selling items produced while the company is preparing the asset for its intended use (effective 1 January 2022) IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets - Amendments regarding the costs to include when assessing whether a contract is onerous (effective 1 January 2022) IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Amendments resulting from Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018 - 2020 (fees in the ’10 per cent’ test for derecognition of financial liabilities (effective 1 January 2022) (ii) New and revised standards that are effective but with no material effect on the financial statements The following relevant revised Standards have been applied in the financial statements. Their application has not had any significant impact on the amounts reported for the current and prior periods but may affect the accounting for future transaction or arrangement. IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement - Amendments regarding replacement issues in the context of the IBOR reform IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures - Amendments regarding replacement issues in the context of the IBOR reform IFRS 9 Financial Instruments - Amendments regarding replacement issues in the context of the IBOR reform IFRS 16 Leases - Amendments regarding issues in the context of the IBOR reform IFRS 16 Leases - Amendment to extend the exemption from assessing whether Covid-19 related rent concession is a lease modification The directors anticipate that these Standards and Interpretation will be applied on their financial statements at the above effective dates in future periods. The directors have not yet had an opportunity to consider the potential impact of the application of these amendments. NOTES NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2022 147 146 Phoenix Beverages Limited Integrated Report 2022 Phoenix Beverages Limited Integrated Report 2022

RkJQdWJsaXNoZXIy MTcyNjcwMw==